Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: generate json schema programmatically #97

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 8, 2024
Merged

chore: generate json schema programmatically #97

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

arjunattam
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@changeset-bot changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 9e23fdc

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@saikatmitra91 saikatmitra91 changed the title [WIP] generate schema programmatically chore: generate json schema programmatically Apr 8, 2024
@saikatmitra91 saikatmitra91 marked this pull request as ready for review April 8, 2024 19:52
@saikatmitra91 saikatmitra91 merged commit 44f0639 into main Apr 8, 2024
2 checks passed
@saikatmitra91 saikatmitra91 deleted the schema-generator branch April 8, 2024 19:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@saikatmitra91 saikatmitra91 saikatmitra91 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@arjunattam @saikatmitra91